Legal Opinion
United Transportation Union Local 1745 v. City of Albuquerque
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 28, 1999No. 97-2394, 97-2400PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellees are 155 bus drivers employed by defendant-appellant, the City of Albuquerque (“City”).1 Most of them work “split shifts,” in that they work a morning shift and a late afternoon shift, separated by a three to five-hour split shift period in which they are free to do what they wish, before reporting back at a specific location to begin their second shift. The drivers brought this action against the City, claiming that the City violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, and the Portal-to-Portal Act, 29 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Foote v. SpiegelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Davoll v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Alvarez v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Breakthrough Management Group, Inc. v. Chukchansi Gold Casino & ResortCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C. v. StidhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Plumley v. Southern Container, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.