Legal Opinion
Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. New York City Transit Authority, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 17, 1995No. 555, Docket 94-6104PublishedCited by 148 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVAL, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Arthur D. Spatt, Judge, in favor of the plaintiff, the United States Department of Labor (“DOL”), holding that the New York City Transit Authority (the “TA”) is required to compensate each of its Police Department’s canine handlers, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. (the “FLSA”), as amended by the Portal-to-Portal Act, 29 U.S.C. § 251, et seq., for the entire time spent commuting to and from work accompanied by the dog entrusted to him.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Ted L. Lindow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- Kuebel v. Black & Decker Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Nancy Kosakow v. New Rochelle Radiology Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Bonilla v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Jorge E. Arriaga v. Florida Pacific Farms, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Young v. Cooper Cameron Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.