Legal Opinion
United States v. Alexander
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 21, 1995No. Nos. 93-50595, 93-50612, 93-50663 and 93-50831PublishedCited by 155 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
These are the consolidated appeals of defendants Gary Edward Aexander, Jonathan Harrington, Anthony F.- Hicks and Willie James Harris. The defendants appeal their convictions for conspiracy to commit robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d); and use of a firearm during commission of a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c).
The defendants contend their Sixth Amendment right to trial by an impartial jury was violated because the district court (1) failed to strike for cause two…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by155 opinions
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Curtis R. Martin, Jr., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Julio GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. CordobaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Ted Stevenson Angwin and Christine KhamisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.