Legal Opinion
United States v. Ted Stevenson Angwin and Christine Khamis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 21, 2001No. 00-50276, 00-50411PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by District Judge BREYER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge FERGUSON.
ORDER
The opinion filed on August 30, 2001, and reported at 263 F.3d 979, is hereby amended. With the filing, of the amended opinion, Appellee Angwin’s petition for rehearing is denied. Judge Silverman has voted to deny Appellee Angwin’s suggestion for rehearing en banc. Judge Ferguson and Judge Breyer so recommend. An amended opinion is filed herewith.
OPINION
BREYER, District Judge:
The appellants Ted Stevenson Angwin and Christine Khamis (“the defendants”) were stopped by United States Border Patrol…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Jose Luis Gonzalez-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Fred S. PangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Angelica LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Michael H. Boulware, United States of America v. Michael H. BoulwareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.