Legal Opinion
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Curtis R. Martin, Jr., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 13, 2002No. 00-10443, 00-10607PublishedCited by 182 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Curtis R. Martin, Jr., entered a conditional guilty plea to one count each of mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341; wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343; interstate transportation of stolen property, 18 U.S.C. § 2314; and money laundering, 18 U.S.C. § 1957. In his plea agreement, Defendant reserved the right to appeal his sentence and the denial of his motion to suppress.
Defendant had moved to suppress all the government’s evidence, arguing that it was obtained “in violation of his right to privacy in his relationship with his attorney.” On appeal from the denial of that…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by182 opinions
- Ward v. ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. RicheyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. GrafCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. RuehleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Butler v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.