Legal Opinion

Ross v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided August 25, 1988No. 86-5309PublishedCited by 1,161 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist

During the selection of the jury in his capital murder trial, petitioner Bobby Lynn Ross resorted to one of his peremptory challenges to remove a juror whom the trial court should have excused for cause under Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510 (1968). He claims that because of that fact the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution require reversal of his conviction and sentence of death. We conclude they do not.

In the course of robbing a motel in Elk City, Oklahoma, petitioner killed a police officer. Petitioner was charged with first-degree murder, Okla. Stat.,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,161 opinions

  1. Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. State v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Mu'Min v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. Martinez-SalazarSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

1,156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API