Legal Opinion

Clark v. Brings

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 1969No. 41289PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

While working as a babysitter for respondents’ three young children, appellant was without warning attacked and bitten by their pet Siamese cat. She brought this action to recover for the extensive injuries which allegedly resulted, and she appeals from an order denying a new trial after the court below directed a verdict for respondents and from the judgment entered pursuant to that verdict. These alternative contentions are argued: (1) That the common-law cause of action for injuries by animals should be changed, or the statute covering injuries by dogs judicially…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Morse v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Brice v. . BauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Goodwin v. E. B. Nelson Grocery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Twigg v. RylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  5. Fake v. AddicksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. Larson Transfer & Storage, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Jackson v. MateusUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Boitz v. PreblichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Ryman Ex Rel. Ryman v. AltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Matson v. KivimakiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API