Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Mateus

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 2003No. 20010387PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Associate Chief Justice:

T1 This appeal concerns the liability of a cat owner for injuries caused by the actions of a domestic cat. Judith Campbell Jackson, who was bitten by the cat, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Robert and Kris Mateus, the cat's owners. The district court held that the Mateuses had no duty to prevent their cat from attacking Jackson and therefore could not be held liable for negligence. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

12 "In reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we view the facts and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. BakalovUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Millett v. Clark Clinic Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. West Jordan v. MorrisonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Boyer v. SealSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  5. Slisze v. Stanley-BostitchUtah Supreme Court · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ducote v. BolewareLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. State v. GarnerUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Colosimo v. Gateway Cmty. ChurchUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Ramsey v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  5. State v. WillisUtah Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API