State ex rel. Shimola v. City of Cleveland
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Pursuant to former S.Ct.Prac.R. VIII, Section 1, now S.Ct. Prac.R. X, Section 2, mandamus actions filed originally in this court “shall proceed as any civil action under the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure.” See, also, R.C. 2731.09. When appropriate, a Civ.R. 55 default judgment may be entered in a mandamus action. State ex rel. Spirko v. Court of Appeals (1986), 27 Ohio St.3d 13, 27 OBR 432, 501 N.E.2d 625. “When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by these rules, the party entitled to a judgment by default shall…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Testa v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- State ex rel. Weiss v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Village of Botkins v. LawsOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Spirko v. Judges of the Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by31 opinions
- State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Solomon v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Disability & Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Huntington Insurance Agency, Inc. v. DuryeeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Lucius v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.