State ex rel. Village of Botkins v. Laws
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Relator contends that it is entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel respondents to (1) reimburse it a reasonable amount for sums paid to its *385village solicitor for past prosecutions in the Sidney Municipal Court of criminal violations of state law occurring within the village, and (2) pay its village solicitor prospectively a reasonable amount for such prosecutions. In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, relator must establish that (1) relator has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, (2) respondent has a clear legal duty to perform the act requested, and (3) relator has no…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Cleveland Municipal Court v. Cleveland City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Patterson v. V & M Auto BodyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Willis v. SheboyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State ex rel. Carter v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Sinay v. SoddersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Shimola v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- State ex rel. Massie v. Board of Education of Gahanna-Jefferson Public SchoolsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.