Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Village of Botkins v. Laws

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1994No. 92-2144PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Per curiam

Relator contends that it is entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel respondents to (1) reimburse it a reasonable amount for sums paid to its *385village solicitor for past prosecutions in the Sidney Municipal Court of criminal violations of state law occurring within the village, and (2) pay its village solicitor prospectively a reasonable amount for such prosecutions. In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, relator must establish that (1) relator has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, (2) respondent has a clear legal duty to perform the act requested, and (3) relator has no…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Cleveland Municipal Court v. Cleveland City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Patterson v. V & M Auto BodyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Willis v. SheboyOhio Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Carter v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Sinay v. SoddersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Shimola v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. State ex rel. Massie v. Board of Education of Gahanna-Jefferson Public SchoolsOhio Supreme Court · 1996

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API