Legal Opinion

Pedersen v. Blythe

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 2012No. S-14620PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAASSEN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Siegfried Pedersen was convicted of assault and weapons misconduct. He brought a civil suit against the victims of those crimes, Daniel Blythe and Bobbie Luxford, alleging defamation and trespass. The superior court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss on grounds of collateral estoppel. Pedersen appeals.

We conclude that the superior court erred when, in deciding the motion to dismiss, it considered matters outside the pleadings without advising Pedersen of its intent to do so and giving him a reasonable opportunity to respond. We hold that this…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Buck v. Thomas M. Cooley Law SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. French v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Kollodge v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Eric Forrer v. State of Alaska and Lucinda MahoneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Cornelison v. TIG InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Kanuk Ex Rel. Kanuk v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Luther v. LanderAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Summer Sagoonick v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API