Cornelison v. TIG Insurance
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOLGER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
An employer and its workers' compensation insurer challenged a former employee's continuing eligibility for workers' compensation, relying on surreptitious video surveillance and a doctor's report issued after the doctor viewed an edited surveillance video. The employee and his wife sued the employer's workers' compensation carrier and a number of others involved in the attempt to terminate benefits; they alleged several causes of action, contending that the video had been purposely edited to provide a false picture of the employee's physical abilities…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Stafford v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. of New York, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Burton v. Fountainhead Development, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Active Release Techniques, LLC v. Xtomic, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- Anderson v. Department of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Lance Pruitt v. State of Alaska, Office of Lt. Governor Kevin Meyer, Division of Elections, Director Gail Fenumiai, and Elizabeth A. Hodges SnyderAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- SMJ Gen. Constr., Inc. v. Jet Commercial Constr., LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.