Legal Opinion

Cornelison v. TIG Insurance

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 2016No. 7119 S-15647PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

An employer and its workers' compensation insurer challenged a former employee's continuing eligibility for workers' compensation, relying on surreptitious video surveillance and a doctor's report issued after the doctor viewed an edited surveillance video. The employee and his wife sued the employer's workers' compensation carrier and a number of others involved in the attempt to terminate benefits; they alleged several causes of action, contending that the video had been purposely edited to provide a false picture of the employee's physical abilities…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Stafford v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. of New York, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Burton v. Fountainhead Development, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Active Release Techniques, LLC v. Xtomic, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Anderson v. Department of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Lance Pruitt v. State of Alaska, Office of Lt. Governor Kevin Meyer, Division of Elections, Director Gail Fenumiai, and Elizabeth A. Hodges SnyderAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. SMJ Gen. Constr., Inc. v. Jet Commercial Constr., LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API