Legal Opinion

Marriage of Pekarek v. Pekarek

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 19, 1985No. CX-84-1567PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

James Pekarek appeals the dissolution judgment awarding Judith Pekarek maintenance, child support, and certain property distribution. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand in part.

FACTS

Judith N. Pekarek (respondent) and James R. Pekarek (appellant) were married in 1966. They have four children, none of whom were emancipated at the time of their dissolution trial.

By the time of trial Judith had completed the course requirements for a master’s degree in psychiatric nursing but needed to complete a thesis to earn her degree. At that time she was employed at Ramsey…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marriage of Erlandson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. In Re the Marriage of O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Marriage of Lammi v. LammiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marriage of Pekarek v. WilkingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Redding v. ReddingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Marriage of Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Marriage of Pekarek v. PekarekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API