Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION FORSBERG, Judge.
This is an appeal from a supplemental judgment relating to maintenance and property issues in a bifurcated dissolution proceeding. This court affirmed the judgment on the custody and temporary support and maintenance issues. Johnson v. Johnson, 363 N.W.2d 355 (Minn.Ct.App.1985). Appellant challenges the trial court’s valuation of marital property, award of maintenance, and failure to divide non-marital property. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Natalie and respondent Carl Peter Johnson were married on March 11, 1978, and have two children. Carl is a pilot for Northwest…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Van De Loo v. Van De LooCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Faus v. FausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Marriage of Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marriage of Doering v. DoeringCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986