Legal Opinion

Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 20, 1985No. C9-85-95PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION FORSBERG, Judge.

This is an appeal from a supplemental judgment relating to maintenance and property issues in a bifurcated dissolution proceeding. This court affirmed the judgment on the custody and temporary support and maintenance issues. Johnson v. Johnson, 363 N.W.2d 355 (Minn.Ct.App.1985). Appellant challenges the trial court’s valuation of marital property, award of maintenance, and failure to divide non-marital property. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Natalie and respondent Carl Peter Johnson were married on March 11, 1978, and have two children. Carl is a pilot for Northwest…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Marriage of Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Van De Loo v. Van De LooCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Faus v. FausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Marriage of Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marriage of Doering v. DoeringCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API