Marriage of Erlandson v. Erlandson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
*37AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
Appeal by Rose Helen Erlandson from an order for judgment and judgment and decree entered April 30, 1980, in which the marital status of Rose and Marlin Erland-son was dissolved pursuant to the petition of Marlin on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in the type and amount of maintenance awarded to Rose. Affirmed.
Rose and Marlin were married October 31,1959. A son and daughter were born of the marriage. At the time of dissolution, Rose was 49 and Marlin was 48 years of age and both children were living with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marriage of Otis v. OtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Lillehei v. LilleheiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
3Cited by85 opinions
- Marriage of Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Van De Loo v. Van De LooCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re the Marriage of O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Broms v. BromsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Tomscak v. TomscakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.