Legal Opinion

Redding v. Redding

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 30, 1985No. C3-85-125, C6-84-2098PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Following dissolution of their marriage, both parties challenge trial court decisions on appellant’s shares of stock in family corporations. We affirm in part, modify in part, reverse in part and remand.

FACTS

A September 1984 judgment of the trial court dissolves the fifteen year marriage of the parties.

At the time of trial, appellant James Red-ding owned stock in two family corporations, Windom State Investment Company (Investment) and Windom State Bank (Bank). He held 4,465 shares, 13.78 percent of Investment stock, and he owned 100 shares, 1.25 percent of Bank stock.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Marriage of Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Marriage of Schmitz v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Marriage of Kottke v. KottkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marriage of Oldewurtel v. ReddingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Redding v. OldewartelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Marriage of Oldewurtel v. ReddingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API