Fay v. Steubenrauch
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for the substitution of parties pending an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Napa County. E. D. Ham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an application for the substitution of S. P. Lunt, as appellant, in place and stead of A. M. Quinn. In support of the application, it is made to appear that the action was to foreclose a mortgage executed by defendant Steubenrauch upon lands which were subsequently conveyed to the defendant Quinn. After decree of foreclosure and appeal to this court therefrom, defendant Quinn conveyed the land to S. P. Lunt, and subsequent to this conveyance died. There has been no administration upon .the estate of Quinn, and the estate is no longer interested in the outcome of the litigation.
Section…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Reay v. HeazeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Emerson v. McWhirterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hogan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Service v. Sumpter Valley Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Erickson v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Hollaway v. Scripps Memorial HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Anderson v. SchloesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.