Anderson v. Schloesser
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
On November 11, 1904, the plaintiff, H. P. Anderson, commenced in the superior court of Lassen County an action against Amalia Schloesser to recover from her certain sums claimed to be due on account of her liability as a stockholder in Playden Hill Golden Eagle Mining Company, a corporation. A writ of attachment was issued, and was, on the twenty-eighth day of November, 1894, levied on the defendant’s interest in the Evening Star Mine. On August 28, 1905, the court gave judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant Amalia Schloesser for $2,258.70 with costs and interest. It was in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Young v. RosenbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Crescent Canal Co. v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Trumpler v. TrumplerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southwest Airlines Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Estate of Le Clerc, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1887
- Schuler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Schuler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989