Legal Opinion
In Re Grossman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 15, 2007No. 06-BG-123PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary proceeding against respondent, Jodie Grossman, 1 the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has recommended that we impose substantially different reciprocal discipline of disbarment to commence for purposes of reinstatement on the date respondent files a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit.
On December 2, 2005, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County indefinitely suspended 2 respondent from the practice of law for intentionally misusing and converting client funds, failing to safeguard and promptly pay over or deliver funds,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re WeekesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re HilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re UscinskiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re David H. LoomisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In Re UscinskiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.