Legal Opinion
Housing Authority v. Lamothe
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 8, 1993No. 14603PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether, under the facts of this case, the trial court improperly denied the defendant tenant, Lucienne Lamothe,1 an opportunity to present evidence of duress and mistake in support of her motion to open a judgment by stipulation in a summary process action. The Appellate Court affirmed the judgment of the trial court, holding that the defendant had been provided an adequate opportunity to be heard. Housing Authority v. Lamothe, *75927 Conn. App. 755, 761, 610 A.2d 695 (1992). We thereafter granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal to this…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. McElveenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Crest Pontiac Cadillac, Inc. v. HadleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. McCahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Doe v. RoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. WhitneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.