Legal Opinion
Doe v. Roe
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 1, 1998No. SC 15901PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The narrow question presented by this appeal is whether the Superior Court has subject matter jurisdiction to render judgment in accordance with an agreement that includes a promise by a surrogate mother to consent to the termination of her parental rights in Probate Court. The trial court, Pittman, J., rendered judgment in accordance with such an agreement. Subsequently, the trial court, Alander, J., *654upon review of the judgment, and after concluding that it purported to terminate the surrogate mother’s parental rights, vacated the judgment on the ground that, under the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Michaud v. WawruckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Demar v. Open Space & Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Rich-Taubman Associates v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Housing Authority v. LamotheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Lawrence Brunoli, Inc. v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Martinez v. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- St. George v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- In re Joshua S.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.