Legal Opinion

Indianapolis & Martinsville Rapid Transit Co. v. Hall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1905No. 20,636PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From Hendricks Circuit Court; Thomas J. Gofer, Judge. Action by John M. Hall against the Indianapolis & Martinsville Rapid Transit Company. From a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $1,200, defendant appeals. Transferred ,Jfrom Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtGillett, C. J.

This was an action by appellee to recover for an injury to his person. He and his daughter were witnesses on his case in chief, and they testified to his condition after his injury. While so testifying said witnesses stated that appellee made complaint to the attending physicians of certain pains, and also incidentally testified to declarations claimed to have been made by said physicians, while treating appellee, as to the nature.and probable result of his injury. The following remark, attributed to Dr. Hylton, is illustrative of the latter class of declarations: “He said that his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Deal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Mutual Life Insurance v. WilerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Higham v. VanosdolIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lever Bros. Co. v. Atlas Assur. Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  2. Isenhour v. SPEECE, ADMR.Indiana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Roper v. Cannel City Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Mitchem v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Albert Johann & Sons Co., Inc. v. EcholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API