Roper v. Cannel City Oil Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the St. Joseph Superior Court; George Ford, Judge. Action by the Cannel City Oil Company against Ella M. Eoper. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBatman, J.
This is an action by appellee against appellant on a promissory note. The complaint was answered by a general denial and a plea of non est factum. The cause was tried by a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of appellee, and on which judgment was rendered against appellant for $625 and costs. A motion for a new trial was filed and overruled. This action of the court constitutes the sole error on which appellant relies for a reversal.
Appellee contends that this appeal cannot be considered on its merits, because the transcript is not properly authenticated. This question was determined…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rowell v. KleinIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Lindquist v. DicksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AdamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Buffkin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Barnett v. GlutingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fox v. LavenderUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Downham v. WagnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Heffner v. WhiteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Jones v. KasperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
- Moehlenkamp v. ShatzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.