Legal Opinion

Counterpoint, Inc. v. Essex Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1998No. 98-155PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Appellant, Counterpoint, Inc., filed an action against respondent, Essex Insurance Company, in the Sixth Judicial District Court, Park County, after Essex refused to defend and indemnify Counterpoint in a wrongful discharge action under a liability insurance policy. Pursuant to the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgement regarding the terms of insurance coverage, the District Court granted judgment in Essex’s favor. Counterpoint appeals, and we affirm.

¶2 The dispositive issue before us is whether Essex was bound by the liability insurance policy to defend and indemnify Counterpoint in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bruner v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Stutzman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Wellcome v. Home InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Treichel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Essex Insurance Company v. VincentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY v. Ribi Immunochem Research, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lee v. USAA Casualty InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Steadele v. Colony InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Pablo v. MooreMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Grimsrud v. HagelMontana Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API