Legal Opinion

Steadele v. Colony Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2011No. DA 10-0351PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Stephen and Dawn Steadele (the Steadeles) filed this action against Colony Insurance Company (Colony) to recover on a default judgment they were awarded against Montana Component Housing Corp. (MCHC), Colony’s insured. The District Court for the Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County, denied the Steadeles’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and granted Colony’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. The Steadeles appeal. We affirm.

¶2 The Steadeles raise two issues on appeal which we have restated as follows:

¶3 1. Whether the District Court erred in granting summary

judgment to Colony based…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY v. Ribi Immunochem Research, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Mitchell v. State Farm InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. United National Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Montana Metal Buildings, Inc. v. ShapiroMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Grimsrud v. HagelMontana Supreme Court · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Newman v. Scottsdale InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Estate of Gleason v. Central United Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Landa v. Assurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Harris v. St Vincent and Billings CMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Forsman v. United Financial Casualty Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2013

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API