Legal Opinion

Grimsrud v. Hagel

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2005No. 04-256PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Warner

¶ 1 Michael Frank Hagel (‘Hagel”), Defendant and Cross-Appellant, and Plaintiffs J ay Grimsrud (‘Grimsrud”), Steve Wentz (‘Wentz’), and *144EMC Insurance Company (‘EMC’), appeal from an Amended Judgment entered February 18, 2004, in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (‘State Farm’), based on an Order and Memorandum granting State Farm’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in holding that the exclusion in State

Farm’s motor vehicle liability insurance policy for damage to property being transported…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Staples v. FARMERS UNION MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Transamerica Insurance v. RoyleMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Stutzman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Lee v. USAA Casualty InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Bain v. GleasonMontana Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Steadele v. Colony InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Watson v. DundasMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Gliko v. PermannMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Blake v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Kostelecky v. Peas in a PodMontana Supreme Court · 2022

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API