Legal Opinion

Dixon v. GEICO

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 29, 2010No. 3127 EDA 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

1 A.3d 921 (2010)

Lamont DIXON, Appellant

v.

GEICO, Appellee.

No. 3127 EDA 2009

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted June 9, 2010.

Filed July 29, 2010.

Scott B. Cooper, Harrisburg and John C. Capek, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Platte B. Moring, III, Center Valley, for appellee.

BEFORE: BENDER, OTT and KELLY, JJ.

OPINION BY KELLY, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Lamont Dixon, appeals from the order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee, GEICO, on his claim for underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits. The trial court concluded that the facts were not in dispute, and the issue of coverage could be decided as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Marks v. Nationwide Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Johnson v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Ario v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Nordi v. Keystone Health Plan West Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API