Legal Opinion

Hulse v. Job Service North Dakota

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1992No. Civ. 920161PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINE, Justice.

Barry Hulse appeals from a district court judgment affirming Job Service’s decision denying him unemployment compensation benefits. We hold that his sotto voce utterance of an expletive did not constitute benefit-disqualifying “misconduct” and, therefore, reverse and remand.

Hulse was employed for approximately two-and-a-half years as a child care .worker for Dakota Boys Ranch Association (Boys Ranch). On September 1, 1991, Hulse spent his day off working the shift of a cook who was on vacation. The shift went beyond schedule and Hulse, anxious to finish so that he could leave,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Nordling v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Schadler v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Perske v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Newland v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baier v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Johnson v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Holiday Inn v. KarchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Morris v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. ProServe Corp. v. RaineyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API