Hulse v. Job Service North Dakota
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Barry Hulse appeals from a district court judgment affirming Job Service’s decision denying him unemployment compensation benefits. We hold that his sotto voce utterance of an expletive did not constitute benefit-disqualifying “misconduct” and, therefore, reverse and remand.
Hulse was employed for approximately two-and-a-half years as a child care .worker for Dakota Boys Ranch Association (Boys Ranch). On September 1, 1991, Hulse spent his day off working the shift of a cook who was on vacation. The shift went beyond schedule and Hulse, anxious to finish so that he could leave,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Nordling v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Schadler v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Perske v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Newland v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Baier v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Johnson v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Holiday Inn v. KarchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Morris v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- ProServe Corp. v. RaineyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.