Legal Opinion
Rutherford v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 9, 1987No. D003131PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
E. C. Rutherford, S. P. Rutherford, and Julia Ann Reutter (R utherford) appeal a judgment in favor of the State of California, Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game, and several individuals for injunctive and declaratory relief, inverse condemnation, violation of constitutional rights pursuant to 42 United States Code section 1983 and violation of rights guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Rutherford contends the trial court erred in finding Fish and Game Code section 1603 1 constitutional on its face and as applied;…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Mark Eilrich v. Bernard J. RemasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Alfaro v. TerhuneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Marshall v. Pasadena Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.