Legal Opinion
Hollander v. Etymotic Research, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 1, 2010No. Civil Action 10-526PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TUCKER, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are Defendant Etymotic Research, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss or Transfer (Doc. 13); Plaintiff Bentley Hollander’s Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 14); Defendant’s Motion to File a Reply (Doc. 15); and Plaintiffs Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 16). For the reasons set forth below, this Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or Transfer, and deny Defendant’s Motion to File a Reply.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Bentley Hollander (“Plaintiff’) has brought this qui tarn action against Defendant…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brinkmeier v. BIC CORP.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Brinkmeier v. GRACO CHILDREN'S PRODUCTS INC.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- North Carolina Farmers' Assistance Fund, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
- Hollander v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- ALPINE COUNTRY CLUB v. SOMPO AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.