Legal Opinion

Brinkmeier v. BIC CORP.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided August 25, 2010No. Civ. 09-860-SLR, 10-01-SLRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION 1

On November 13, 2009, Jennifer L. Brinkmeier (“plaintiff’) filed Civ. No. 09-860 alleging false marking against BIC Corporation and BIC USA Inc. (collectively, “defendants”) pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 292. 2 (Civ. No. 09-860, D.I. 1) Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that BIC falsely marked products with expired U.S. Patent Nos. 4,496,309 (“the '309 patent”), 4,509,916 (“the '916 patent”), and RE 33,-282 (“the '282 patent”) and seeks monetary damages. (Id., D.I. 1 at 2, 7) BIC seeks dismissal of the complaint pursuant to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burtch v. Opus, L.L.C. (In re Opus East, L.L.C.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  2. Brinkmeier v. GRACO CHILDREN'S PRODUCTS INC.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
  3. North Carolina Farmers' Assistance Fund, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
  4. Hollander v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Promote Innovation LLC v. Roche Diagnostics Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API