Legal Opinion
Hollander v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 5, 2011No. Civil Action 10-00836PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the Motion of Defendant Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Ortho”) to Dismiss the Amended Complaint of Plaintiff Bentley A. Hollander pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, the Court denies the Motion to Dismiss.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On March 1, 2010, Plaintiff/Relator Bentley A. Hollander, a resident of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, commenced this qui tam action on behalf of the United States against Defendant Ortho, a pharmaceutical company headquartered…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Simonian v. MEADWESTVACO CORP.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011