Legal Opinion

Wilbrecht v. Babcock

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 17, 1930No. 27,648PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

This action was brought against the commissioner of highways and the surety on his official bond to recover damages for casting surface water upon plaintiff’s land. Defendants demurred to the complaint. The trial court overruled the demurrer but certified that the questions involved were important and doubtful. Defendants appealed.

It appears from the complaint that the commissioner of highways, who will be intended by the term defendant hereinafter, constructed state highway No. 6 from the city of Breckenridge to the village of Wheaton; that it passes along the line of plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Wadsworth v. Town of MiddletownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. Carpenter v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Yealy v. FinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  5. Roerig v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Smith v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Holmquist v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Susla v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Linder v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. Hjorth v. WhittenburgUtah Supreme Court · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API