Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Goar v. Hoffmann

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 24, 1941No. 32,682PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Upon the petition of appellant, an alternative writ of mandamus issued in the court below against respondent, the commissioner of highways. On the day of hearing, the petition and writ were by stipulation and consent amended so as to eliminate all parties other than appellant and the respondent; and thereupon respondent moved for judgment upon the pleadings. The motion was granted, and the appeal is from the judgment.

The facts alleged in the amended petition and writ may be thus summarized: On and for some time prior to April 22, 1939, appellant was employed as a bridge worker…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Schmidt v. YoungquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reed v. TrovattenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  2. State Ex Rel. Longman v. KachelmacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Nollet v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Bolden v. Hennepin County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API