Schmidt v. Bauer
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been the result of the defendant’s negligence. There was a trial by jury. When the plaintiff’s evidence was in, the defendant moved for a nonsuit, which was denied. There was a verdict for the plaintiff; the defendant’s motion for a new trial was denied, and he appeals.
The evidence on the part of the plaintiff showed substantially that the defendant was a keeper of a liquor-saloon, and that his private residence was connected *567therewith, in the same building; that the plaintiff was in the saloon drinking- beer; that he asked…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Parker v. Portland Publishing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879
- Pierce v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Vermont · 1875
- Victory v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Toomey v. SanbornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Tuttle v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Chafor v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.