Legal Opinion

E.C. Cates Agency, Inc. v. Barbe

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1988No. 87-239, 87-240PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The core of the problems presented in these appeals is confusion on the part of a layman with respect to rights and obligations flowing to and from individuals and corporations which the individuals control. The difficulty is exacerbated by the efforts of E.C. Cates to represent himself and his corporation. The district court ruled that Cates’ pleadings did not state a claim for which relief could be granted because of the misalignment of parties. In addition, the district court ruled that Cates could not represent E.C. Cates Agency, Inc. as its attorney since he was not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kipp v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Geibel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Aviation Maintenace Publishers, Inc. v. Capital Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hamburg v. HeilbrunWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hamburg v. HeilbrunWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Basolo v. GoseWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Boyd v. NationWyoming Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API