Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1993No. 92-244PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

Appellant Helen June Davis appeals her conviction for two counts of delivery of methamphetamines and one count of conspiracy to deliver methamphetamines. Appellant raises issues concerning the applicability of the exclusionary rule when a search warrant’s supporting affidavit contained false statements and the appropriateness of the court’s ordering appellant to pay prosecution costs.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Appellant stated the issues as:

*921. When a police officer obtains a search warrant with deliberately or recklessly false misstatements, should the fruits of the warrant be admitted…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. State v. PetersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Guerra v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Belden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Lobatos v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Madrid v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hall v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API