Legal Opinion
Hamburg v. Heilbrun
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided February 14, 1995No. 94-115PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Justice.
Appellants Michael Lee Hamburg and Raymond Carl Hamburg appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint against the Torrington Telegram newspaper and Denise Heilbrun.
We affirm.
Appellants present five issues for review:
1. Did the plaintiffs have a complaint for which relief could be granted[?]
2. Did jurisdiction under Titlt [sic] VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 1991 apply in this ease[?]
3. Is the Torrington Telegram liable for the sexual harassment caused by Denise Heilbrun[?]
4. Did the District Court deny plaintiffs due process in ignoring the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Elder v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Osborn v. Emporium VideosWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Young v. HawksWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- E.C. Cates Agency, Inc. v. BarbeWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Korkow v. MarkleWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bear Peak Resources, LLC v. Peak Powder River Resources, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Hamburg v. HeilbrunWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Jones v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Sonnett v. First American Title Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Basolo v. GoseWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.