Legal Opinion

Roemhildt v. Gresser Companies, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 29, 2007No. A06-1721, A06-1793PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

These consolidated appeals are brought by a settling employer and a non-settling employer on issues of contribution. Employee Stanley L. Roemhildt filed a worker’s compensation claim against two former employers and their insurers, Met Con Companies, insured by State Fund Mutual Companies (collectively Met Con), and Gresser Companies, insured by Zurich Insurance Company/Creative Risk Solutions (collectively Gresser). Gresser filed a petition for contribution against Met Con. Gresser commenced payment of benefits pursuant to a temporary order. Gresser and employee…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schuette v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Cargill, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Seehus v. Bor-Son Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Anderson v. Frontier CommunicationsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Botler v. Wagner GreenhousesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API