Legal Opinion
Marose v. Maislin Transport
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 9, 1987No. C1-86-1476, C9-86-1483PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*509OPINION
COYNE, Justice.
The employer and its insurer and the employee all seek review of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals’ amended decision modifying the findings and order of the compensation judge. The WCCA remanded this matter to the Office of Administrative Hearings to obtain medical evidence with respect to apportionment of permanent partial disability resulting from each of several injuries and to determine whether or not the work activity of the employee from February 12, 1981, through July 26, 1982, resulted in a personal injury. The WCCA directed the lower court to enter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Knopp v. GuttermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- State ex rel. Donovan v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Fisher v. RED & WHITE TAXI COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wschola v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- DeNardo v. Divine Redeemer Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- James L. Haugen v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- State v. TraczykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Kulenkamp v. Timesavers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.