Franklin National Bank v. Kennerly Coal & Coke Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
We are asked to vacate the appointment of a receiver which was made on the ground of corporate mismanagement. The appointment of a receiver is a discretionary matter with the court below, and its action will not be disturbed unless there is a clear abuse of sound judicial discretion: McDougall v. Hunt. & Br. T. R. & C. Co., 294 Pa. 108. We suggested in that case a receiver should not be appointed unless there is good reason therefor, but when such reason exists, there should be no hesitancy in making the appointment. After a careful review of the evidence, we are…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Bailey v. Pittsb. Coal R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bowman v. Gum, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Sale v. Ambler (Emmett)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Collins v. CollinssCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Levin v. Pittsburgh United Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Commonwealth ex rel. Chidsey v. Keystone Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.