Legal Opinion
Andrew Carothers, M.D., P.C. v. Progressive Insurance
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided July 5, 2013PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff Andrew Carothers, M.D., EC. (ACMDPC) is a professional corporation which performed MRIs for patients allegedly injured in motor vehicle accidents. ACMDPC operated out of three facilities — one in Brooklyn, one in Queens and one in the Bronx. At the time the MRI services in question were rendered, Dr. Andrew Carothers was a board-certified, licensed radiologist, who had been listed on ACMDPC’s corporate filings as its sole shareholder, officer and director.
ACMDPC’s patients assigned to ACMDPC their…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Marine Midland Bank v. John E. Russo Produce Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Andrew Carothers, M.D., P.C. v. Progressive Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- United States v. GabinskayaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- H & H Chiropractic Services, P.C. v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2015
- Andrew Carothers, M.D v. Progressive Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2019
- United States v. GabinskayaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016