Legal Opinion

H & H Chiropractic Services, P.C. v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided April 24, 2015PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1076OPINION OF THE COURT

Larry L. Love, J.

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is decided as follows:

This is an action to recover assigned no-fault benefits for chiropractic services allegedly rendered to plaintiff’s assignor on February 20, 2013 in the billed amount of $1,365.68. Defendant seeks an order dismissing this action based upon plaintiff’s alleged violation of Insurance Department Regulations Implementing the Comprehensive Motor Vehicle Insurance Reparations Act (11 NYCRR) § 65-3.16 [a] [12]), which states as follows:

“A provider of health care services is not eligible for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MallelaNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Metroscan Imaging, P.C. v. GEICO InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006
  3. Bajaj v. General AssuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
  4. Sachs v. SaloshinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Andrew Carothers, M.D., P.C. v. Progressive InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. GEICO v. MayzenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
  2. Matter of Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. New Way Massage Therapy P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API