H & H Chiropractic Services, P.C. v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1076OPINION OF THE COURT
Larry L. Love, J.
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is decided as follows:
This is an action to recover assigned no-fault benefits for chiropractic services allegedly rendered to plaintiff’s assignor on February 20, 2013 in the billed amount of $1,365.68. Defendant seeks an order dismissing this action based upon plaintiff’s alleged violation of Insurance Department Regulations Implementing the Comprehensive Motor Vehicle Insurance Reparations Act (11 NYCRR) § 65-3.16 [a] [12]), which states as follows:
“A provider of health care services is not eligible for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MallelaNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Metroscan Imaging, P.C. v. GEICO InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006
- Bajaj v. General AssuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
- Sachs v. SaloshinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Andrew Carothers, M.D., P.C. v. Progressive InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- GEICO v. MayzenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
- Matter of Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. New Way Massage Therapy P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015