Legal Opinion
Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 5, 1995PublishedCited by 1,040 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to that Court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.
Plaintiff, Claire Lolik, slipped and fell on a wet spot on the floor of defendant’s supermarket and she and her husband instituted this action to recover damages for her resultant injuries. The jury awarded Claire Lolik $12,000 for past pain and suffering, and apportioned liability, but failed to award her damages for future pain and suffering or to award her husband damages on his derivative cause…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Moffatt v. MoffattNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Delgado v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Moffatt v. MoffattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by1,040 opinions
- Tapia v. Dattco, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Grassi v. UlrichNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Exarhouleas v. Green 317 Madison, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Stacy S. Killon v. Robert A. ParrottaNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- Hoover v. New Holland North America, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2014
1,035 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.