Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gabrielli, J.
The question presented on this appeal is whether the Appellate Division was correct in concluding as a matter of law that *496the jury verdict awarding punitive damages to plaintiffs was based on insufficient evidence. For the reasons discussed below, we disagree with the conclusion reached by the Appellate Division, and thus the order appealed from must be reversed.
The plaintiffs in this action are a professional model and her daughter. In October, 1966, several pictures of the mother holding her then infant child were taken by one Ken Heyman, a professional…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bernardine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- McDonald v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Gregoire v. G. P. Putnam's SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- York Mortgage Corp. v. Clotar Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,669 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Northern Westchester Professional Park Associates v. Town of BedfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Howell v. New York Post Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
1,664 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.