Legal Opinion
Meyers v. Hankins Bros.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 11, 1926No. 2528PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.
This is a suit under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. (Act 20 of 1914, and amendments.)
Plaintiff sues for compensation at $5.68 per week for the death of her son, Pinckney Richards, who was killed while in the employ of defendants.
Paragraph 3 of the petition reads as follows :
*191“That as part of the said Hankins Brothers’ business and occupation of bridge construction work and in doing repairs on the highway bridge across Red River at Grand Ecore, about four (4) miles north of the city of Natchitoches, Louisiana, in said parish, they operated and run a ferry boat or flat for the purpose of cross…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Washington v. W. C. Dawson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. KierejewskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Peters v. VeaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Orleans Dredging Co. v. FrazieMississippi Supreme Court · 1935
- Swan v. Baton Rouge Transp. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
- Independence Indemnity Co. v. MansfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Blasdel v. McElroyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Haynes v. Luckenbach Gulf S. S. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.