Legal Opinion

Peters v. Veasey

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 8, 1919No. 77PublishedCited by 38 opinions

error to the supreme court of the state of LOUISIANA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

delivered the opinion of the court. -

In a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Louisiana (No. 20, Acts La., 1914), the Supreme Court of that State affirmed a judgment against plaintiffs in error and in favor of Veasey, who claimed to have suffered injuries, August 6,1915, while employed by Henry and Eugene Peters as a longshoreman on board the “Seria,” then lying at New Orleans. The steamer was being unloaded. While upon her and engaged in that work, Veasey accidentally fell through a hatchway. 142 Louisiana, 1012.

Á compensation policy in favor of Peters, issued by the ¿Etna…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. State Industrial Comm'n of NY v. Nordenholt Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Messel v. Foundation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. ætna Ins. Co. v. Houston Oil & Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  5. Proctor v. DillonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API