Legal Opinion
Haynes v. Luckenbach Gulf S. S. Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1936No. 16505PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JANVIER, Judge.
This is a suit for workmen’s compensation under Act No. 20 of 1914, as amended. It comes before us on appeal from a judgment maintaining a plea to the jurisdiction of the civil district court for the parish of Orleans ratione materise and an exception of no canse of action.
Plaintiff alleges that he was employed by defendant corporation as a “longshoreman” and that, because of hazards resulting from a strike which was in progress, he and other employees were being transported by a tugboat operated by defendant corporation from one point at the port of New Orleans to the place at…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Spencer Kellogg & Sons, Inc. v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- T. Smith & Son, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Peters v. VeaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rhinehart v. T. Smith SonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943