Legal Opinion
Washington v. W. C. Dawson & Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 25, 1924No. 366 and 684PublishedCited by 269 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
These causes turn upon the same point, were heard together and it will be convenient to decide them by one opinion.
The immediate question presented by number three hundred sixty-six is whether one engaged in the business of stevedoring, whose employees work only on board ships in the navigable waters of Puget Sound, can be compelled to contribute to the accident fund provided for by the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Washington. The State maintains that the objections to such requirement pointed out in Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Stewart, 253 U. S. 149, were removed by the Act of June 10, 1922,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Western Fuel Co. v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by269 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- American Dredging Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
264 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.