Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Harris

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2002No. 2001-2231PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We must decide in this case whether an attorney who converted money entrusted to him by an institutionalized client should be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court recommended that sanction against respondent, Caesar M. Harris of Cleveland Heights, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0021529, after finding him in violation of DR 1-102(A)(4) and (6) (engaging in dishonest conduct or conduct that otherwise reflects adversely on his fitness to practice law), 2-106(A) (charging an excessive fee),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. BelockOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. KnowltonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KurtzOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ConnorsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. ConnorsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. SquireOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Richland County Bar Ass'n v. BrickleyOhio Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API